This comparative framework is proposed to systematically evaluate the environmental, technological, infrastructural, and lifecycle differences between Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles. It covers the full spectrum from raw material sourcing to end-of-life disposal, including nuanced factors such as supply chains, energy properties, and structural impacts. The goal is to provide a holistic understanding of the trade-offs, challenges, and opportunities associated with each vehicle type.
Although this comparison framework is presented as a series of bullet points, the objective is to encourage readers to dive deeper and conduct their own research (DYOR) rather than to take a firm stance on any one side. The intent is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the various factors involved in choosing between Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles, allowing readers to form their own conclusions based on informed analysis.
The following are the bullets for comparison.
- Upstream (Raw Material Stage)
- Type of raw materials extracted
- Extraction methods and techniques
- Environmental impact of extraction
- Energy consumption during extraction
- Social and human rights concerns
- Processing & Refinement
- Industrial processing complexity
- Pollution and emissions during refinement
- Waste/by-products produced
- Energy sources used
- Geographic concentration of processing facilities
- Supply Chain & Global Logistics
- Geographic origin of critical materials
- Transportation and shipping emissions
- Trade dependencies and risks (e.g., OPEC vs lithium triangle)
- Manufacturing & assembly chain resilience
- Disruption vulnerability (e.g., wars, policy shifts)
- Material Science & Energy Properties
- Energy density (e.g., gasoline vs lithium-ion batteries)
- Synthesis complexity and resource requirements
- Recyclability and material recovery feasibility
- Degradation over time (chemical stability, cycle life)
- Storage efficiency and safety characteristics
- Vehicle Manufacturing
- Materials and components required (e.g., engines, battery packs, electronics)
- Emissions and energy use during assembly
- Battery production footprint
- Integration complexity
- Use of rare or strategic materials
- Vehicle Operation / Usage Phase
- Energy/fuel source (petrol, diesel, electricity)
- Energy efficiency (tank-to-wheel / battery-to-wheel)
- Emissions during usage (tailpipe vs grid-based)
- Maintenance and operational costs
- Dependency on regional electricity/fuel mix
- Infrastructure & Support Systems
- Refueling vs charging infrastructure
- Electrical grid load and planning
- Fuel/electricity transportation logistics
- Smart charging, vehicle-to-grid (V2G), microgrid integration
- Cost and feasibility of scaling infrastructure
- Vehicle Weight & Systemic Impact
- Weight differences (EVs vs ICE vehicles)
- Increased tire wear and particulate emissions
- Road surface stress and accelerated degradation
- Impact on infrastructure design (bridges, parking, curbs)
- Braking system adaptation (regen vs mechanical)
- Efficiency penalties from increased mass
- End-of-Life & Disposal
- Recyclability of vehicle components
- Battery recycling and second-life usage
- Toxic material handling
- Environmental risks from improper disposal
- Waste management infrastructure and regulation
Only through a thorough, multi-dimensional comparison of Electric and Internal Combustion Engine vehicles can we truly evaluate the value and consequences of pursuing one path over the other. Blind enthusiasm or uninformed decisions risk creating new challenges rather than solving existing ones. After all, energy is not created — it is only transformed.
As we reflect on the comparative aspects of Electric and Internal Combustion Engine vehicles, it’s crucial to consider the broader implications for our transportation systems. While individual vehicles remain a key part of modern mobility, the growing environmental and infrastructural challenges point to the potential of public mass transport as a more sustainable solution. Shifting perspectives toward shared mobility options could significantly reduce congestion, lower emissions, and optimize resource usage. More on this topic later…
This initiative is led by superbiker Suraj Naik, a passionate enthusiast of biking and DIY mechanics. If you’re as passionate about bikes, performance, and DIY tuning as I am, let’s stay connected!
I regularly share tuning insights, behind-the-scenes workshop work, and real talk about superbike life. Join the community and let’s keep the wrenching spirit alive. Check out my website https://bikersworkshop.com/ and join me on WhatsApp community and my social media channels by clicking on following links.